Justice without force is powerless; force without justice is tyrannical.Blaise Pascal — Pensées, 1670
Justice is the virtue of giving each person what they are due — rendering to individuals and communities what is rightfully theirs according to some consistent principle. It is one of the four cardinal virtues of the ancient philosophical tradition, and it is the most social of them: justice is by definition a relation between persons rather than a quality of the individual alone.
Plato devoted an entire dialogue — the Republic — to the question of what justice is. His answer, developed through the analogy of the just city to the just person, is that justice is the proper ordering of parts: in a city, each class doing its proper function; in a person, reason governing spirit and appetite in the right proportion. Justice is not an external rule imposed from outside but an internal harmony that produces the right relationship to others as a consequence of the right relationship to oneself.
Aristotle distinguished between distributive justice — the fair distribution of goods and honors according to merit — and corrective justice — the restoration of balance after an unfair exchange or injury. Both require the same foundation: the willingness to take no more than one's due and to give no less than what is owed. The just person is not merely someone who obeys just laws. They are someone whose character is oriented toward the genuine claims of others — who does not need the law to prevent them from taking what is not theirs, because taking what is not theirs is not something they want to do.
Martin Luther King's formulation — justice is what love looks like in public — connects the intimate virtue of genuine care for other people to the institutional and political structures that either realize or betray that care. Love without justice remains private and partial. Justice without love becomes cold procedure. The full realization of either requires both.